Type size dependent anti-aliasing in sub-pixel precision rendering systems

ABSTRACT

Methods and systems for selecting different anti-aliasing filters to be applied to objects of image data rendered with pixel sub-component precision based on the attributes of the objects of the graphics image. For example, when rendering a character traditional anti-aliasing applied in the direction parallel to the striping of the pixel sub-components is adapted to the unique requirements of different character font sizes such that a large amount of anti-aliasing is applied to large font sizes while a small amount of anti-aliasing is provided for characters at small font sizes. Displaced sampling is utilized to determine the alpha values for a plurality of vertical samples for each RGB pixel sub-component. The selected anti-aliasing filter is applied to the alpha values to determine the luminous intensity values of the RGB pixel sub-components.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation application ofcommonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/146,424 filed May14, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,894,701, entitled “Type Size DependentAnti-Aliasing in Sub-Pixel Precision Rendering Systems” which isincorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. The Field of the Invention

The present invention extends to both methods and systems for renderingimages. In particular, the present invention relates to selectingdifferent anti-aliasing filters to be applied to objects of image datarendered with pixel sub-component precision based on the attributes ofthe rendered object.

2. The Relevant Technology

Graphics images are typically stored at sufficiently high resolutions toallow for faithful rendering of the characters of the graphics imagesuch that the human eye cannot perceive irregularities or distortions inthe characters, assuming that the display device on which the images aredisplayed has a sufficiently high resolution. Liquid crystal display(LCD) devices are one of the most common types of display devices onwhich images can be displayed. The complexity and manufacturingrequirements of LCD display devices are such that the resolution oftypical LCD display devices is lower than the resolution supported bymany graphics formats.

LCD display devices generally include a series of pixels arranged inrows and columns. Each pixel includes colored pixel sub-components thattogether are used to create variations in the luminosity and hue of thepixel. Typically, LCD display devices have pixel sub-components that arealigned in vertical (or less commonly, horizontal) stripes ofsame-colored elements, although other patterns exist. When textcharacters are rendered on an LCD screen, the pixels are assigned aluminosity and hue to depict the background and foreground colors of thecharacters. The number of pixels on a display device and the size of thedevice determine the resolution of the display device. When graphicsimages are rendered at the lower resolutions of typical LCD displaydevices, distortions in the rendered image become noticeable,particularly at the edges of the characters of the image data. Suchvariations and distortions in the rendered character include aliasing.Aliasing arises from high spatial frequencies of the original imagealiasing down to low spatial frequencies on the display. Aliasing causesthe edges of characters to appear jagged or stair-stepped. The jagged orstair-stepped appearance resulting from aliasing is often most apparenton the diagonal or curved portions of characters of an image where theedge of the character approaches horizontal. Aliasing is also mostapparent on display devices that do not provide a sufficient number ofpixels to accurately represent such portions of characters.

A variety of anti-aliasing techniques have been developed to compensatefor the distortions created in rendering images on lower resolutiondisplay devices. The traditional method of anti-aliasing, often referredto as gray scaling, blurs the edges of the aliased characters. While theedges of anti-aliased characters are depicted with less clarity, thealiasing in the images becomes less perceptible to the human eye. As aresult, the image appears to be more accurately rendered. Anothertechnique that has been utilized to minimize the distortions of aliasedimages is pixel sub-component precision rendering applied in thedirection perpendicular to the stripes of same-colored pixelsub-components of the LCD display device. In particular, individualpixel sub-components are used as separate luminous intensity sourceswith different portions of the image being mapped to the individualpixel sub-components of the pixels. This technique improves theresolution of the image in the direction perpendicular to the stripesand enables character edges to be placed at boundaries between pixelsub-components. Accordingly, this rendering process reduces the aliasingeffect for character features that are nearly vertical, but does nothave an appreciable effect in reducing aliasing in features that arenearly horizontal.

The degree to which aliasing is apparent on characters renderedutilizing pixel sub-component positioning as described above depends inpart on the font size of the character being rendered. Smaller fontsizes tend to exhibit less visible aliasing, while characters displayedusing larger fonts can appear uneven and jagged.

FIG. 1A illustrates how pixel sub-component precision rendering canresult in large font characters having uneven or jagged edges in regionsof the characters that are nearly horizontal. A portion of a displaydevice 1 is illustrated having a grid of pixels 2, on which a portion ofa character 4 is displayed. Curvilinear segments 4 a represent theunderlying image data that is processed to display the character, whilesegments 4 b represent the boundaries of the image that are displayed ondisplay device as a result of segments 4 a. Character 4 is depicted at alarge font size typical of headline fonts sizes of 25 points or greater.Each pixel 2 has three pixel sub-components (e.g., red, green, and bluepixel sub-components), and each pixel sub-component is separatelycontrolled to represent spatially different portions of the character,which results in increased resolution in the horizontal direction.However, because the resolution is relatively lower in the verticaldirection, and because the characters having large font sizes tend tohave diagonal edges that are aligned in a nearly horizontal orientationover large numbers of pixels (e.g., portion 8), aliasing effects in thevertical direction can be quite pronounced.

With reference now to FIG. 1B, a second character 6 is displayed withsub-pixel precision on the grid of pixels 2. The second character 6 isdepicted at a small font size, such as is often used for rendering text.Curvilinear segments 6 a represent the underlying image data that isprocessed to display the character, while segments 6 b represent theboundaries of the image that is displayed on display device as a resultof segments 6 a. Because characters rendered in smaller fonts tend tohave smaller radii of curvature and portions thereof that are nearlyhorizontal tend to span fewer pixels, the jaggedness of nearlyhorizontal portions of smaller characters is often a less noticeableproblem as shown in FIG. 1B.

For the larger font size character 4 of FIG. 1A or the smaller font sizecharacter 6 of FIG. 1B, anti-aliasing filters in the vertical directioncan be applied to reduce perceived aliasing effects in the verticaldirection. One such anti-aliasing technique is gray scaling, whichresults in pixel sub-components at the edges of the characters having aluminous intensity between that of the foreground and background color.While gray scaling reduces the perception of aliasing, it also blurs thecharacter edges. For characters that have relatively wide characterfeatures, such as character 4 of FIG. 1A, blurring of the edges is not asignificant problem, since boundary pixel sub-components represent arelatively small proportion of the pixel sub-components used to renderthe character. However, for smaller characters, such as character 6 ofFIG. 1B, blurring the edges of the characters can result in making thecharacter difficult to see. Thus, applying conventional anti-aliasingtechniques to characters, such as characters 4 and 6, result in poorlydefined small font characters, whereas applying no anti-aliasing to suchcharacters results in noticeable aliasing in large font characters.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention extends to methods and systems for renderingimages. In particular, the present invention relates to selectingdifferent anti-aliasing filters to be applied to objects of image datarendered with pixel sub-component precision based on the attributes ofthe rendered object. This enables anti-aliasing filters to be tailoredto the unique requirements of different font sizes. Large font sizesbenefit from a large amount of anti-aliasing in the direction parallelto the striping of the pixel sub-components. The large number of pixelsdepicting character stems of large font sizes makes the blurred edges ofgray-scaled characters less significant. Small font sizes are renderedfaint and less readable when exposed to a large amount of gray scaling.Accordingly, by applying a small amount of anti-aliasing or none at allfor characters at small font sizes, the desired contrast at characteredges can be maintained.

In one embodiment of the present invention a plurality of differentanti-aliasing filters are provided. Each of the plurality ofanti-aliasing filters provides a different amount of anti-aliasing inthe direction parallel to the striping of the pixel sub-components. Whenthe processing device renders an image, the font size of a character isidentified and a corresponding anti-aliasing filter is selected from oneof the plurality of different anti-aliasing filters. The anti-aliasingfilter selected for small font sizes provides a small amount ofanti-aliasing or none at all. The anti-aliasing filter selected forlarge font sizes provides a relatively large amount of anti-aliasing.The anti-aliasing filters selected for intermediate font sizes provideintermediate amounts of anti-aliasing. As the font sizes of thecharacters progress from small to large, the amount of anti-aliasingprovided by the selected filters increases.

In one embodiment, a selected filter is utilized for multiple font sizesin a range of font sizes. In an alternative embodiment, each selectedfilter corresponds with a single, different font size. The plurality offilters can be arranged such that an anti-aliasing filter is selectedwhich provides a small amount of anti-aliasing for all characters havinga font size below a given lower font-size threshold. Characters renderedutilizing the anti-aliasing filter for small font sizes approximatecharacters in which no anti-aliasing is applied. Similarly, an upperfont-size threshold can be selected above which an anti-aliasing filteris selected which provides a relatively large amount of anti-aliasing.Font sizes intermediate to the upper and lower font-size thresholds areassigned filters providing intermediate levels of anti-aliasing.

Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth inthe description which follows, and in part will be obvious from thedescription, or may be learned by the practice of the invention. Thefeatures and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained bymeans of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out inthe appended claims. These and other features of the present inventionwill become more fully apparent from the following description andappended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention asset forth hereinafter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and otheradvantages and features of the invention can be obtained, a moreparticular description of the invention briefly described above will berendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which areillustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawingsdepict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not thereforeto be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will bedescribed and explained with additional specificity and detail throughthe use of the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1A illustrates the manner in which pixel sub-component renderingcan result in large font size characters having uneven or jagged edges.

FIG. 1B illustrates how the uneven and jagged edges of small font sizecharacters rendered with sub-pixel precision are less noticeable thanthe edges of larger font sizes.

FIG. 2 illustrates a portion of an LCD display device with image datasuperimposed thereon.

FIG. 3A illustrates the manner in which displaced sampling is used togenerate an array of intermediate alpha values that are to be used forvertical anti-aliasing.

FIG. 3B illustrates the application of a selected vertical anti-aliasingfilter to the intermediate alpha values of FIG. 3A.

FIG. 4 depicts an illustrative data structure having a plurality ofweighted anti-aliasing filters.

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate the manner in which the weighting of theanti-aliasing filters are applied to the alpha values calculated forvertical samples of the alpha triplets associated with the RGB pixelsub-components.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating the method by which type sizedependent anti-aliasing is utilized in the context of the presentinvention.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram depicting an illustrative operatingenvironment in which the present invention can be utilized.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention extends to both methods and systems for renderingimages. In particular, the present invention relates to selecting ananti-aliasing filter to be applied to a character rendered with pixelsub-component precision based on the font size of the character to berendered. This enables the degree of anti-aliasing applied to thecharacters to be based on the unique characteristics of different fontsizes. The anti-aliasing filter is applied in the direction parallel tothe pixel sub-component striping. Large font sizes benefit from a largeamount of anti-aliasing in the direction parallel to the striping of thepixel sub-components. As mentioned herein, the large number of pixelsdepicting character features of large font sizes makes gray scaled edgesless noticeable. Small font sizes are rendered faint and less readablewhen a large amount of gray scaling is applied. Accordingly, by applyinga small amount of anti-aliasing for characters at small font sizes, thecontrast needed to clearly render such characters can be maintained.

In one embodiment of the present invention a plurality of differentanti-aliasing filters are provided. Each of the plurality ofanti-aliasing filters supplies a different amount of anti-aliasing. Whenthe processing device renders a character, the font size of thecharacter is determined and a corresponding anti-aliasing filter isselected from one of the different anti-aliasing filters. At small fontsizes, the selected filters provide a small amount of anti-aliasing. Atlarge font sizes the selected filters provide a large amount ofanti-aliasing. At intermediate font sizes the selected filters provideintermediate amounts of anti-aliasing that increase as the font size ofthe character progresses from smaller to larger.

I. Sampling of Image Data

Prior to describing the use of anti-aliasing filters, reference will bemade to FIG. 2, which depicts general principles associated with thesteps of rendering image that are typically conducted prior to applyinganti-aliasing filters to one or more characters in an image. FIG. 2illustrates a pixel grid 10 on a region of an LCD display device thatincludes pixels that in turn include pixel sub-components. Pixels on thepixel grid 10 are arranged in a series of columns (C1–C5) and a seriesof rows (R1–R4). First pixel 12 is presented to illustrate the way inwhich pixels depict the characters of a graphics image on a typical LCDdisplay device. First pixel 12 corresponds to column C1 and row R1. Thefirst pixel 12 includes red, green, and blue pixel sub-componentsarranged to be horizontally adjacent to one another. The other pixels ofthe LCD display device, including the pixels that are verticallyadjacent to pixel 12 also include corresponding red, green, and bluepixel sub-components. Thus, the pixel sub-components of verticallyadjacent pixels on an LCD display form stripes of same-colored pixelsub-components. While the present invention is primarily describedherein in reference to vertical stripes of same-colored pixelsub-components, those of skill in the art will recognize that theinvention is also applicable to a variety of other configurationsincluding, but not limited to, horizontal striping and diagonalstriping.

FIG. 2 also illustrates a portion of a character 14 superimposed overpixel grid 10. The image data that is processed according to theinvention defines the character 14 in terms of the shape of the outline16 of the character and the foreground and background colors that areused to render the character. To render character 14, a rasterizer firstinterprets the graphics instructions, fitting the outlines 16 of image14 to the pixel grid 10. Once the outlines of character 14 are fitted tothe pixel grid 10, the rasterizer scan-converts the optionallygrid-fitted outlines and fills samples corresponding to the scanconverted outlines into a bitmap. A more detailed discussion of thegrid-fitting, scan conversion, and sampling operations that can be usedwith the invention is presented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,219,025, which isincorporated herein by reference. In one embodiment, a string consistingof multiple characters is rasterized by first grid-fitting all of thecharacters of the string, then scan converting the entire string. Inanother embodiment, a non-character graphical object is typically notgrid-fitted, but scan-converted with algorithms known in the art. Therasterization of any of these graphical objects will produce a bitmap.

FIG. 3A illustrates a portion of a bitmap 18 that has been generated asdescribed above by grid-fitting, scan-converting, and sampling character14, or other graphical objects. The bitmap created using the samples ofthe image data is used to generate the luminous intensity values thatare applied to the red, green, and blue pixel sub-components of the LCDdisplay device. Moreover, the bitmap specifies which of the samples fallwithin the outline 16 of character 14 and which fall outside. It is alsonoted that multiple samples are obtained for each region of the imagedata that corresponds to a full pixel on the display device. Althoughthe oversampling factors that determine the number of samples per pixelcan vary, depending on the particular implementation of the invention,in general, multiple samples are obtained in both the horizontal andvertical directions per pixel. In the example illustrated in FIG. 3A,the oversampling factor is 6 in the horizontal direction and 5 in thevertical direction. The oversampling factor in the horizontal direction(i.e., perpendicular to the stripes of the display device) enablesdifferent sets of samples to be mapped to each of the pixelsub-components of the pixels, thereby enhancing the resolution in thehorizontal direction and providing anti-aliasing. The oversamplingfactor in the vertical direction (i.e., parallel to the stripes of thedisplay device) enables the vertical anti-aliasing filters to beapplied.

The portion of bitmap 18 illustrated in FIG. 3A represents the portionof the bitmap used according to this embodiment of the invention toapply the anti-aliasing filters. In particular, the region of bitmap 18includes columns SC1–SC10 and rows SR1–SR7. The heavier vertical andhorizontal lines that bound columns SC3–SC8 and rows SR2–SR6 correspondto the boundaries of the pixel of the display device. Thus, in general,the region of bitmap 18 to which the anti-aliasing filters of theinvention are applied corresponds to the samples within the boundary ofthe corresponding pixel as well as one or more rows and columns ofadjacent pixels. Moreover, the regions of the bitmap used to applyanti-aliasing to other pixels are mutually overlapping.

The number of rows of samples corresponds with number of samples in thevertical direction as dictated by the vertical overscaling factor plusthe number of adjacent samples required for the vertical anti-aliasingfilters. In one embodiment of the present invention, the number ofvertically adjacent samples provided is determined according to therequirements of the plurality of different anti-aliasing filters. Theanti-aliasing filters of the invention utilize samples of the image datapositioned outside of the region that corresponds to a particular pixelto determine luminous intensity values to be applied to the pixelsub-components of the pixel. As described in greater detail below, thevertical anti-aliasing filters suppress the high vertical frequencies inbitmap 18 and thereby reduce the jagged appearance that would otherwisebe exhibited. A tradeoff for this anti-aliasing processing is that thecontrast that would otherwise exist between the pixel sub-componentsthat represent the foreground color of the character and the pixelsub-components that represent the background color is generally reduced.

In the illustrated embodiment, an overscaling factor of 5:1 is utilizedin the vertical direction (the direction parallel to the striping of thepixel sub-components.) Additionally, two rows of vertically adjacentsamples (SR1 and SR7) are included in the region of bitmap 18 provided.Accordingly, the vertical anti-aliasing filters can be applied to asmany as seven rows of samples in the illustrated embodiment. While theillustrated embodiment depicts seven vertically adjacent rows ofsamples, with SR1 and SR7 being taken from adjacent pixels, it will beappreciated that substantially any number and configuration of samplescan be utilized within the scope and spirit of the present invention.

The samples are also mapped in sets of horizontally adjacent columnsSC1–SC10. The number of columns corresponds with the number of samplesin the horizontal direction as determined by the horizontal overscalingfactor, plus the number of horizontally adjacent columns of samplesutilized to determine the alpha values corresponding with each RGBtriplet. In the illustrated embodiment, a horizontal overscaling factorof 6:1 is utilized. Additionally, two adjacent columns of samples areutilized from the left adjacent pixel, while two adjacent columns ofsamples are utilized from the right adjacent pixel.

II. Calculation of Alpha Triplet Values

The region of bitmap 18 illustrated in FIG. 3A is used to generate afinal alpha triplet value corresponding to the red, green, and bluepixel sub-components of the corresponding pixel. In other words, theregion of bitmap 18 is processed to determine the luminous intensityvalues that are applied to the red, green, and blue pixelsub-components. As described below, the bitmap is processed such thateach of the red, green, and blue pixel sub-components represents aspatially different portion of the image data, which has the effect ofincreasing the resolution of the display in the horizontal direction.Moreover, the bitmap is processed such that aliasing artifacts arereduced in the vertical direction by selecting one of the plurality ofanti-aliasing filters according to the invention, based on the fontsize.

The bitmap 18 is first processed by filtering adjacent sets of samplesin each row SR1–SR7 to obtain a set of intermediate alpha valuescorresponding to the red, green, and blue pixel sub-components. Thisprocess is described in detail in reference to row SR7, but is repeatedfor each of the rows SR1–SR7. FIG. 3A illustrates samples 20 a–jcorresponding with the horizontally adjacent samples of row SR7. Forexample, an alpha value αr7 is calculated for row SR7 samples 20 a–f.The lower case r, g., and b notation in αr, αg, αb indicates that thesealpha values are merely intermediate rather than being the final αR, αG,αB values that are to be eventually used to control the pixelsub-components. In one embodiment, a value of 0 or 1 is assigned foreach sample depending on whether the sample corresponds with theforeground color (e.g., black) or the background color (e.g., white) ofthe character. These values of 0 or 1 for each of the samples 20 a–f arethen totaled or averaged to determine an alpha value αr7.

The alpha value αg7 for row SR7 is determined in a similar manner usingsamples 20 c–h. The alpha value αb7 for row SR7 is determined usingsamples 20 e–j. In summary, the processing device translates thehorizontally adjacent samples for each row into triplets of alphavalues, with one alpha value being generated for each of the three pixelsub-components. Alpha values for each of the pixel sub-components arecalculated for each of the other rows SR1–SR6 utilizing the methodologydescribed with respect to row SR7 to generate the array of intermediatealpha values 24 of FIG. 3A. A variety of methods and filters can beutilized to determine the intermediate alpha values within the scope andspirit of the present invention.

III. Vertical Anti-Aliasing Filter Selection

Once the intermediate alpha values for the region of the bitmap 18 thatcorresponds to a particular pixel have been calculated for each of therows SR1–SR7, an anti-aliasing filter is selected based on the font sizeof the character. The anti-aliasing filter is selected from a pluralityof anti-aliasing filters that are specified for use with particular fontsizes. The anti-aliasing filters are adapted to suppress high verticalfrequencies in bitmap 18. FIG. 3B illustrates the array of intermediatealpha values 24 that were generated as described above in reference toFIG. 3A. The selected anti-aliasing filter 26 of FIG. 3B is applied inthe direction parallel to the striping of the display device (i.e. inthe direction orthogonal to the direction in which the horizontal filteris applied) to convert the intermediate alpha values 24 to a final setof alpha values 28 (αR, αG, αB) that are used to control the red, green,and blue pixel sub-components 30 of the corresponding pixel.

The anti-aliasing filter 26 is selected from among a plurality ofavailable filters so as to provide a degree of anti-aliasing that hasbeen determined to be appropriate based on the font size of thecharacter that is being displayed. In general, relatively large fontsizes result in a filter 26 that provides a relatively large amount ofanti-aliasing, whereas relatively small font sizes result in a filter 26that provides a relatively small amount of anti-aliasing, or none atall.

In one embodiment of the present invention, an anti-aliasing filterproviding a first amount of anti-aliasing is selected for all charactersbelow a given font size. In another embodiment an anti-aliasing filterproviding a second, greater amount of anti-aliasing is selected for allcharacters above a given font size. In yet another embodiment a lowerfont-size threshold is provided for all font sizes below a given fontsize. An upper font-size threshold is provided for all font sizes abovea given font size. Characters having font sizes between the lowerfont-size threshold and upper font-size threshold are anti-aliased usingone or more anti-aliasing filters adapted to provide an intermediateamount of anti-aliasing.

The invention can be applied to documents having characters withdifferent font sizes, resulting in different anti-aliasing filters beingapplied to the different characters of the document. For example, duringthe rendering of such an image, a first anti-aliasing filter is selectedbased on a first font size of a first character to be displayed. As apart of the process of displaying the first character, the firstanti-aliasing filter is applied to the first character. A differentsecond anti-aliasing filter is selected based on a second font size of asecond character having a font size that is larger than the font size ofthe first character. As a part of the process of displaying the secondcharacter, the second anti-aliasing filter is applied to the secondcharacter. The amount of anti-aliasing provided by the secondanti-aliasing filter is greater than the amount of anti-aliasingprovided by the first anti-aliasing filter. Accordingly, the contrastbetween the foreground and background luminous intensity valuesgenerated as a result of using the second anti-aliasing filter is lessthan the contrast between the foreground and background luminousintensity values generated as a result of using the first anti-aliasingfilter, but the nearly horizontal portions of the characters filteredwith the second anti-aliasing filter look smoother than those portionsfiltered with the first anti-aliasing filter.

The invention can apply different anti-aliasing filters to graphicalobjects that are not single characters. For example, in one embodiment,a string of characters with the same font size can be rendered with theanti-aliasing filter appropriate for a character of that font size. Inan alternative embodiment, graphics consisting of lines and/or curvescan be rendered with an anti-aliasing filter that depends on thethickness of the lines and/or curves. Thin lines and/or curves arerendered using a small amount of anti-aliasing, while thick lines and/orcurves are rendered using a large amount of anti-aliasing. In oneembodiment, the anti-aliasing filter selected to be applied to an objecthaving a particular line/curve width is the same anti-aliasing filterselected for fonts with similar stem widths. In yet another embodiment,graphical objects with appreciable thickness (e.g., filled-in circles,rectangles, etc.) are rendered with an anti-aliasing filter providingthe maximum amount of anti-aliasing.

The anti-aliasing filter is applied in the direction parallel to thestriping of the pixel sub-components. This provides anti-aliasing to thecharacter in the direction in which sub-pixel rendering fails to provideadditional resolution. In the illustrated embodiment, the verticaldirection is the direction parallel to the striping of the pixelsub-components. If, however, the striping of the display device ishorizontal, the anti-aliasing generated by the selected anti-aliasingfilters is applied in the horizontal direction.

In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the filterscomprise weighted filters. Weighted anti-aliasing filters operate bycalculating the weighted sums or averages of the vertically adjacentintermediate alpha values. In one embodiment of the present invention,the number of vertically adjacent intermediate alpha values that aregiven non-zero weightings increases as the font size corresponding tothe anti-aliasing filters increases. In other words, filters for largerfont sizes in this embodiment are applied to larger numbers ofvertically adjacent rows.

The amount of anti-aliasing provided by the filter is based on theweighting factors of the filter. Each filter provides a weighting factorfor each of the vertically adjacent alpha triplets for each RGB pixelsub-component. Weighted filters and the corresponding weighting factorswill be discussed in greater detail with reference to FIG. 4. Theanti-aliasing filters that can be utilized in the context of the presentinvention are not limited to weighted filters and any of a variety ofother filters can be utilized, including those that may be known tothose of skill in the art.

With reference now to FIG. 4, there is shown an illustrative datastructure having a plurality of weighted anti-aliasing filters. The datastructure includes a series of fields. Each field correlates with one ofthe plurality of anti-aliasing filters assigned to a range of fontsizes. The parameters that define the weighting factors applied to thevertically adjacent alpha values of FIG. 3B are also shown. As used inFIG. 4, the top adjacent sample, the 0^(th) sample through the 4^(th)sample, and the bottom adjacent sample, correspond, respectively, to theintermediate alpha triplet values of rows SR1 through SR7 of FIGS. 3Aand 3B. For instance, a weighting factor of 2 to be applied to a “bottomadjacent sample” as defined in the data structure of FIG. 4 means that aweighting factor of 2 is to be applied to the alpha triplet value (αr7,αg7, αb7) of FIGS. 3A and 3B.

As previously mentioned, an anti-aliasing filter is selected from theplurality of different anti-aliasing filters based on the font size ofthe character to be displayed. In the data structure of FIG. 4, nineweighted filters numbered 0 through 8 are provided. While theillustrated embodiment of the present invention includes nine weightedfilters, any number of filters, other than a single filter, can be usedin the context of the present invention.

Filter 0 corresponds with font sizes of 16 and below. In the illustratedembodiment, the font size of 17 is the lower font-size threshold belowwhich filter 0 is selected to provide the desired amount ofanti-aliasing. Filter 8 corresponds with font sizes of 31 and above. Inthe illustrated embodiment, the font size of 30 is the upper font-sizethreshold above which filter 8 is selected to provide the desire amountof anti-aliasing. Filters 1 through 7 correspond with font sizes between16 and 31, with each filter representing two font sizes. While theselection of anti-aliasing filters is discussed in the context of fontsizes, it will be appreciated that the method of determining the size ofthe character to be rendered need not be based on a strictinterpretation of font size. For example, in one embodiment, the pixelsper em (ppem) can be used to calculate the size of the image to berendered. Additionally, for graphic objects stem width, line thickness,or other attributes of the object can be used to select the appropriateanti-aliasing filter. There are a variety of methods and configurationsby which the size of the character to be rendered can be determinedwithin the scope and spirit of the present invention.

As previously mentioned, characters having large font sizes generallybenefit from a large amount of anti-aliasing. Accordingly, filter 8 isselected for characters having font sizes 31 and larger due to the largeamount of anti-aliasing provided by filter 8. The amount ofanti-aliasing provided by filter 8 is determined based on the weightingfactors for each of the vertically adjacent samples of filter 8. Filter8 provides a smaller weighting factor for the bottom and top adjacentsamples with a gradual increase in the weighting factors applied toalpha values, or samples, nearer the center of the pixel (see FIGS. 3Aand 3B). Accordingly a large amount of anti-aliasing is provided byfilter 8 to the character edges.

Filter 0 provides a small amount of anti-aliasing in the verticaldirection. The weighting factors provided by filter 0 are zero for allbut the three vertically adjacent alpha values positioned at the centerof the pixel. The greatest weighting is applied to the middle sample(2^(nd) sample). In other words, the anti-aliasing filter only usessamples that lie vertically within the pixel with the middle samplebeing the most important. Accordingly, the luminous intensity valueassigned to the pixel sub-components for small font sizes is determinedalmost entirely by the samples near the center of the region of thebitmap that corresponds to a pixel. Images rendered utilizinganti-aliasing filter 0 are similar to the images rendered utilizing noanti-aliasing, due to the small amount of anti-aliasing provided byfilter 0. While filters 8 and 0 are provided as examples of filters usedfor characters having a substantial difference in font size, it can beseen that the amount of anti-aliasing provided by filters used withrelatively larger character size is greater than the amount ofanti-aliasing provided by filters used with relatively smaller charactersizes.

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate the manner in which the weighting factors ofthe anti-aliasing filters are applied to the alpha values calculated forthe vertical samples of the RGB pixel sub-components. Lobe 30 representsthe weighting factors provided by filter 7 of FIG. 4. In the illustratedembodiment, filter 7 is assigned to characters with font sizes of 29 and30 and is adapted to provide the high amount of anti-aliasing needed forlarge font sizes. Lobe 40 represent the weighting factors provided byfilter 0 of FIG. 4. In the illustrated embodiment, filter 0 is assignedto characters having font sizes of 16 and below due to the small amountof ant-aliasing provided by filter 0.

A plurality of positions 31–37 on the Y axis corresponding to lobe 30represent the alpha values of vertically adjacent samples orintermediate alpha values for each RGB pixel sub-component to which theweighting factors are applied. For filter 7, position 31 correspondswith the alpha value of the top adjacent sample and is assigned aweighting factor of 1 on lobe 30. Position 32 corresponds with the alphavalue of the 0^(th) vertically adjacent sample and is assigned aweighting factor of 5. Position 33 corresponds with the alpha value ofthe 1^(st) vertically adjacent sample and is assigned a weighting factorof 7. Position 34 corresponds with the alpha value of the 2^(nd)vertically adjacent sample (sample taken from the middle of the pixel)and is assigned a weighting factor of 10. Positions 35–37 correspondwith alpha values of the 3^(rd), 4^(th), and bottom samples and areassigned weighting factors of 7, 5, and 1, respectively.

Due to the wide and shallow configuration of lobe 30, and the weightingfactors corresponding to the lobe 30, a large amount of anti-aliasing isprovided by filter 7. The edges of characters to which a large amount ofanti-aliasing is applied have a greater amount of intermediate shadingthan characters to which a small amount of anti-aliasing is applied. Theintermediate shading is achieved by assigning luminosity intensityvalues intermediate to foreground and background pixel sub-components atthe edges of the pixels.

In contrast, the narrow and sharp configuration of lobe 40, and thecorresponding weighting factors corresponding to lobe 40 result in asmall amount of anti-aliasing being provided by filter 0. Weightingfactors of zero correspond to positions 41, 42, 46, and 47. Positions41, 42, 46, and 47 in turn represent the alpha values of the topadjacent sample, 0^(th) sample, 4^(th) sample, and bottom adjacentsample. Only positions 43, 44, and 45, which correspond with the 1^(st)sample, 2^(nd) sample, and 3^(rd) sample taken from near the middle ofthe pixel are provided with a non-zero weighting factor.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating the method by which type sizedependent anti-aliasing is utilized in the context of the presentinvention. In the method, displaced sampling is utilized to determinethe alpha values of horizontally adjacent rows 1–n in step 52. Themethod of displaced sampling to determine the alpha values for thevertical samples is discussed in greater detail with reference to FIGS.3A and 3B. Once the alpha values for the horizontally adjacent rows ofsamples are determined, the font size of the character being rendered isdetermined in step 54. Based on the font size of the character beingrendered, an anti-aliasing filter is selected from a plurality ofanti-aliasing filters in step 56. The selected anti-aliasing filter isapplied to the character in the vertical direction by multiplying thealpha values for the horizontally adjacent rows of samples by theweighting factors provided by the anti-aliasing filter in step 58. Theresulting products of the weighting factors and the alpha values areadded for each RGB pixel sub-component to determine the luminousintensity value of the pixel sub-component in step 60. Once theresulting products have been added together, the resulting luminosityintensity values are applied to the RGB pixel sub-components to displaythe anti-aliased version of the character in step 62.

IV. Exemplary Computing Environment

The embodiments of the present invention may comprise a special purposeor general-purpose computer including various computer hardware, asdiscussed in greater detail below. Embodiments within the scope of thepresent invention also include computer-readable media for carrying orhaving computer-executable instructions or data structures storedthereon. Such computer-readable media can be any available media thatcan be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. By wayof example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media cancomprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage,magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any othermedium which can be used to carry or store desired program code means inthe form of computer-executable instructions or data structures andwhich can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.When information is transferred or provided over a network or anothercommunications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or a combinationof hardwired or wireless) to a computer, the computer properly views theconnection as a computer-readable medium. Thus, any such connection isproperly termed a computer-readable medium. Combinations of the aboveshould also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions anddata which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer,or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function orgroup of functions.

FIG. 7 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief,general description of a suitable computing environment in which theinvention may be implemented. Although not required, the invention hasbeen described in the general context of computer-executableinstructions, such as program modules, being executed by computers innetwork environments. Generally, program modules include routines,programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that performparticular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.Computer-executable instructions, associated data structures, andprogram modules represent examples of the program code means forexecuting steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequenceof such executable instructions or associated data structures representsexamples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions describedin such steps.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may bepracticed in network computing environments with many types of computersystem configurations, including personal computers, hand-held devices,multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumerelectronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and thelike. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computingenvironments where tasks are performed by local and remote processingdevices that are linked (either by hardwired links, wireless links, orby a combination of hardwired or wireless links) through acommunications network. In a distributed computing environment, programmodules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.

With reference to FIG. 7, an exemplary system for implementing theinvention includes a general purpose computing device in the form of aconventional computer 120, including a processing unit 121, a systemmemory 122, and a system bus 123 that couples various system componentsincluding the system memory 122 to the processing unit 121. The systembus 123 may be any of several types of bus structures including a memorybus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any ofa variety of bus architectures. The system memory includes read onlymemory (ROM) 124 and random access memory (RAM) 125. A basicinput/output system (BIOS) 126, containing the basic routines that helptransfer information between elements within the computer 120 such asduring start-up, may be stored in ROM 124.

The computer 120 may also include a magnetic hard disk drive 127 forreading from and writing to a magnetic hard disk 139, a magnetic diskdrive 128 for reading from or writing to a removable magnetic disk 129,and an optical disk drive 130 for reading from or writing to removableoptical disk 131 such as a CD-ROM or other optical media. The magnetichard disk drive 127, magnetic disk drive 128, and optical disk drive 130are connected to the system bus 123 by a hard disk drive interface 132,a magnetic disk drive-interface 133, and an optical drive interface 134,respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable mediaprovide nonvolatile storage of computer-executable instructions, datastructures, program modules and other data for the computer 120.Although the exemplary environment described herein employs a magnetichard disk 139, a removable magnetic disk 129 and a removable opticaldisk 131, other types of computer readable media for storing data can beused, including magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digitalversatile disks, Bernoulli cartridges, RAMs, ROMs, and the like.

Program code means comprising one or more program modules may be storedon the hard disk 139, magnetic disk 129, optical disk 131, ROM 124 orRAM 125 including an operating system 135, one or more applicationprograms 136, other program modules 137, and program data 138. A usermay enter commands and information into the computer 20 through keyboard140, pointing device 142, or other input devices (not shown), such as amicrophone, joy stick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like.These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit121 through a serial port interface 146 coupled to system bus 123.Alternatively, the input devices may be connected by other interfaces,such as a parallel port, a game port or a universal serial bus (USB). Amonitor 147 or another display device is also connected to system bus123 via an interface, such as video adapter 148. In addition to themonitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral outputdevices (not shown), such as speakers and printers.

The computer 120 may operate in a networked environment using logicalconnections to one or more remote computers, such as remote computers149 a and 149 b. Remote computers 149 a and 149 b may each be anotherpersonal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device orother common network node, and typically include many or all of theelements described above relative to the computer 120, although onlymemory storage devices 150 a and 150 b and their associated applicationprograms 136 a and 136 b have been illustrated in FIG. 7. The logicalconnections depicted in FIG. 7 include a local area network (LAN) 151and a wide area network (WAN) 152 that are presented here by way ofexample and not limitation. Such networking environments are commonplacein office-wide or enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and theInternet.

When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 120 is connectedto the local network 151 through a network interface or adapter 153.When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 120 may includea modem 154, a wireless in link, or other means for establishingcommunications over the wide area network 152, such as the Internet. Themodem 154, which may be internal or external, is connected to the systembus 123 via the serial port interface 146. In a networked environment,program modules depicted relative to the computer 120, or portionsthereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will beappreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and othermeans of establishing communications over wide area network 152 may beused.

The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms withoutdeparting from its spirit or essential characteristics. The describedembodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrativeand not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicatedby the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. Allchanges which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of theclaims are to be embraced within their scope.

1. In a processing device associated with a display device that has aplurality of pixels, each pixel having a plurality of separatelycontrollable pixel sub-components, a method of applying selectedanti-aliasing filters when rendering an image, comprising the acts of:based on one or more attributes of an object in the image to bedisplayed, selecting an anti-aliasing filter from a plurality ofanti-aliasing filters, wherein the plurality of anti-aliasing filtersincludes at least a first anti-aliasing filter and a secondanti-aliasing filter, and wherein the anti-aliasing filters are selectedin such a manner that an amount of anti-aliasing performed by theplurality of anti-aliasing filters increases as a value of the one ormore attributes of the object correspondingly increases, wherein saidone or more attributes includes at least one of a font size, a stemwidth or a thickness; and displaying the object on the display device,wherein spatially different sets of samples obtained by applying theanti-aliasing filter selected are mapped to individual pixelsub-components.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the object comprises acharacter.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more attributescomprise the font size of the character.
 4. The method of claim 1,wherein the object comprises a graphical object.
 5. The method of claim4, wherein the one or more attributes comprise a stem width of thegraphical object.
 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the one or moreattributes comprise the thickness of lines and/or curves comprising thegraphical object.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the firstanti-aliasing filter has a smaller anti-aliasing effect than the secondanti-aliasing filter.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the secondanti-aliasing filter is adapted to suppress high spatial frequencies oflarger objects with which the second anti-aliasing filter is utilized.9. The method of claim 8, wherein the second anti-aliasing filterproduces smoother characters by reducing jaggedness of the characteredges.
 10. In a processing device associated with a display device thathas a plurality of pixels, each pixel having a plurality of separatelycontrollable pixel sub-components, a method of applying selectedanti-abasing filters when rendering characters and in such a manner thatanti-aliasing performed by the anti-aliasing filters increases as thefont size of the characters increases, comprising the acts of: based ona first font size of a first character to be displayed, selecting afirst anti-aliasing filter; applying the first anti-aliasing filter tothe first character; based on a second font size of a second characterto be displayed, selecting a different second anti-aliasing filter thatprovides more anti-aliasing than the first anti-aliasing filter, whereinthe second font size is larger than the first font size; applying thesecond anti-aliasing filter to the second character; and displaying thefirst character on the display device, wherein spatially different setsof samples obtained by applying the first filter are mapped toindividual pixel sub-components; and displaying the second character onthe display device, wherein spatially different sets of samples obtainedby applying the second anti-aliasing filter are mapped to individualpixel sub-components.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein ananti-aliasing filter providing a first amount of anti-aliasing isapplied to all characters having a font size below a given lowerfont-size threshold.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein ananti-aliasing filter providing a second amount of anti-aliasing isapplied to all characters having a font size exceeding a given upperfont-size threshold wherein the first amount of anti-aliasing is lessthan the second amount of anti-aliasing.
 13. The method of claim 12,wherein a sequence of anti-aliasing filters providing progressivelygreater amounts of anti-aliasing are provided for font sizes between thelower and upper font-size thresholds such that the amount ofanti-aliasing provided by the sequence of anti-aliasing filters isbetween the first and second amount of anti-aliasing.
 14. The method ofclaim 10, wherein the display device comprises an LCD display devicehaving a plurality of pixel sub-components arranged to form stripes ofsame colored pixel sub-components, wherein the first and secondanti-aliasing filters are applied in a direction parallel to the stripesof the display device.
 15. The method of claim 10, wherein the firstanti-aliasing filter uses samples that lie vertically within the pixeland wherein, the second anti-aliasing filter uses samples that lievertically within the pixel as well as samples that are verticallyadjacent to the pixel.
 16. In a processing device associated with adisplay device that has a plurality of pixels, each pixel having aplurality of separately controllable pixel sub-components, a method ofrendering an image using an anti-aliasing filter selected from aplurality of anti-aliasing filters based on the font size of a characterof the image, comprising the acts of: storing a data structure thatdefines a plurality of different anti-aliasing filters; identifying theattributes of an object of the image to be rendered; selecting, based onthe identified attributes, an anti-aliasing filter from among theplurality of different anti-aliasing filters, wherein at least two ofthe plurality of different anti-aliasing filters operates by calculatinga weighted sum of adjacent samples of image data that represents theimage, and wherein the anti-aliasing filters are selected in such amanner that an amount of anti-aliasing performed by the anti-aliasingfilters increases as a value of one or more attributes of the objectcorrespondingly increases, the one or more attributes comprising atleast one of a font size, a thickness, and a stem width; and applyingthe selected anti-aliasing filter in a direction parallel to striping ofthe pixel sub-components.
 17. The method of claim 16, further comprisingthe act of mapping spatially different sets of samples of image datathat defines the image to different pixel sub-components of individualpixels so as to display the image with pixel sub-component precision ina direction perpendicular to the striping of the pixel sub-components.18. The method of claim 16, wherein each of the plurality ofanti-aliasing filters provides a different amount of anti-aliasing. 19.The method of claim 16, wherein the amount of anti-aliasing provided byfilters selected based on a relatively larger object body thickness isgreater tan the amount of anti-aliasing provided by filters selectedbased on relatively smaller object body thickness.
 20. The method ofclaim 19, wherein the number of adjacent samples, which are used by theanti-aliasing filters used to calculate the weighted sum, increases asthe body of the object thickness corresponding to the anti-aliasingfilters increases.
 21. The method of claim 16, wherein the objectcomprises a character and wherein the attributes comprises a font sizeof the character.
 22. The method of claim 21, wherein each of the datastructures includes a series of fields, wherein each field correlateswith one of the plurality of anti-aliasing filters corresponding to arange of font sizes.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein one of theplurality of filters is applied to any character having a font sizelower than a given lower font-size threshold.
 24. The method of claim22, wherein one of the plurality of filters is applied to any characterhaving a font size exceeding a given upper font-size threshold.
 25. Themethod of claim 22, wherein the plurality of anti-aliasing filtersincludes at least three filters.
 26. In a processing device associatedwith a display device that has a plurality of pixels, each pixel havinga plurality of separately controllable pixel sub-components, a method ofselecting an anti-aliasing filter during the rendering of an image fromimage data, comprising the act of: mapping spatially different sets ofsamples of the image data to different pixel sub-components ofindividual pixels in preparation for displaying the image with pixelsub-component precision in a first direction; identifying the font sizeof the image to be rendered; selecting an anti-aliasing filter from aplurality of different anti-aliasing filters based on the font size of acharacter of the image in such a manner that anti-aliasing performed bythe anti-aliasing filters increases as the font size of the charactersincreases; and applying the anti-aliasing filter in a second directionorthogonal to the first direction.
 27. The method of claim 26, whereinone or more of the plurality of different anti-aliasing filters utilizesamples of the image data positioned outside of a region of the imagedata that corresponds to a particular pixel of the display device todetermine luminous intensity values to be applied to the pixelsub-components of the pixel.
 28. The method of claim 27, wherein theplurality of different anti-aliasing filters operate by calculatingweighted sums of luminous intensity information defined by adjacentsamples of the image data.
 29. In a processing device associated with adisplay device that has a plurality of pixels, each pixel having aplurality of separately controllable pixel sub-components, a method ofselecting filters to provide anti-aliasing in rendering an image,comprising the acts of: identifying the font size of a first characterto be rendered, wherein the first character has a first font size;selecting a first filter based on the font size of the first characterto be rendered, wherein the first filter is selected from a plurality offilters based on the amount of anti-aliasing the first filter is adaptedto provide and operates by calculating a weighted sum of adjacentsamples of image data that represents the first character; displayingthe first character utilizing the first filter; identifying the fontsize of a second character to be rendered, wherein the second characterhas a second font size that is greater than the first font size;selecting a second filter based on the font size of the second characterto be rendered, wherein the second filter is selected from the pluralityof filters based on the amount of anti-aliasing the second filter isadapted to provide and operates by calculating a weighted sum ofadjacent samples of image data that represents the second character,such that the second filter will provide more anti-aliasing than thefirst filter because the second character is greater in font size thanthe font size of the first character; and displaying the secondcharacter utilizing the second filter.
 30. The method of claim 29,wherein the first and second characters are displayed on the displaydevice, wherein spatially different sets of samples obtained byapplication of the first and second filters are mapped to individualpixel sub-components.
 31. The method of claim 29, wherein the pluralityof filters comprise a sequence of anti-aliasing filters providingprogressively greater amounts of anti-aliasing for fonts from a lowerfont-size threshold up to an upper font-size threshold such that theamount of anti-aliasing provided ranges from the lower font-sizethreshold to the upper font-size threshold.
 32. A computer programproduct for implementing, in a computer system including a processingdevice and a display device for displaying an image, the display devicehaving a plurality of pixels, wherein each pixel has a plurality ofseparately controllable pixel sub-components, a method of selecting ananti-aliasing filter, the computer program product comprising: acomputer-readable medium carrying computer executable instructions forperforming the method, wherein the method includes the acts of: storinga data structure that defines a plurality of different anti-aliasingfilters; identifying the font size of a character of the image to berendered; selecting, based on the identified font size, an anti-aliasingfilter from among the plurality of different anti-aliasing filters,wherein the plurality of different anti-aliasing filters operates bycalculating a weighted sum of adjacent samples of image data thatrepresents the image, and wherein the anti-aliasing filters are selectedin such a manner that an amount of anti-aliasing performed by theanti-aliasing filters increases as a value of one or more attributes ofthe object correspondingly increases, the one or more attributescomprising at least one of a font size, a thickness, or a stem width;and applying the selected anti-aliasing filter in a direction parallelto striping of the pixel sub-components.
 33. The computer programproduct of claim 32, further comprising the act of mapping spatiallydifferent sets of image data that define the image to different pixelsub-components of individual pixels so as to display the image withpixel sub-component precision in a direction perpendicular to thestriping of the pixel sub-components.
 34. The computer program productof claim 32, wherein the amount of anti-aliasing provided by filtersselected based on relatively larger character size is greater that theamount of anti-aliasing provided by filters selected based on relativelysmaller character size.
 35. A computer program product comprising one ormore computer-readable media having computer-executable instructions forimplementing a method of selecting an anti-aliasing filter during therendering of an image from image data in a processing device associatedwith a display device that has a plurality of pixels, each pixel havinga plurality of separately controllable pixel sub-components, the methodcomprising: mapping spatially different sets of samples of the imagedata to different pixel sub-components of individual pixels inpreparation for displaying the image with pixel sub-component precisionin a first direction; identifying the font size of the image to berendered; selecting an anti-aliasing filter from a plurality ofdifferent anti-aliasing filters based on the font size of a character ofthe image in such a manner that anti-aliasing performed by theanti-aliasing filters increases as the font size of the charactersincreases; and applying the anti-aliasing filter in a second directionorthogonal to the first direction.
 36. In a processing device associatedwith a display device that has a plurality of pixels, each pixel havinga plurality of separately controllable pixel sub-components, a method ofselecting an anti-aliasing filter during the rendering of an image fromimage data, comprising the act of: mapping spatially different sets ofsamples of the image data to different pixel sub-components ofindividual pixels in preparation for displaying the image with pixelsub-component precision in a first direction; identifying the font sizeof the image to be rendered; selecting an anti-aliasing filter from aplurality of different anti-aliasing filters based on the font size of acharacter of the image in such a manner that anti-aliasing performed bythe anti-aliasing filters increases as the font size of the characterincreases; and applying the anti-aliasing filter in a second directionorthogonal to the first direction, wherein one or more of the pluralityof different anti-aliasing filters utilize samples of the image datapositioned outside of a region of the image data that corresponds to aparticular pixel of the display device to determine luminous intensityvalues to be applied to the pixel sub-components of the pixel.
 37. Themethod of claim 36, wherein the plurality of different anti-aliasingfilters operate by calculating weighted sums of luminous intensityinformation defined by adjacent samples of the image data.
 38. Acomputer program product comprising one or more computer-readable mediahaving computer-executable instructions for implementing a method ofselecting an anti-aliasing filter during the rendering of an image fromimage data in a processing device associated with a display device thathas a plurality of pixels, each pixel having a plurality of separatelycontrollable pixel sub-components, the method comprising: mappingspatially different sets of samples of the image data to different pixelsub-components of individual pixels in preparation for displaying theimage with pixel sub-component precision in a first direction;identifying the font size of the image to be rendered; selecting ananti-aliasing filter from a plurality of different anti-aliasing filtersbased on the font size of a character of the image in such a manner thatanti-aliasing performed by the anti-aliasing filters increases as thefont size of the character increases; and applying the anti-aliasingfilter in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, whereinone or more of the plurality of different anti-aliasing filters utilizesamples of the image data positioned outside of a region of the imagedata that corresponds to a particular pixel of the display device todetermine luminous intensity values to be applied to the pixelsub-components of the pixel.